首页
  • k彩平台登陆
  • AZ Parks Proposal
  • Archive for May 2008

    The Worst Thing I have Seen From a Major Media k彩平台登陆 in Quite a While

    The Australian Broadcasting k彩平台登陆 (ABC) web site has an absolutely horrible kid's game called "."  In this game, kids answer lifestyle questions and the program tells them when they should die because they have used up their "fair share" of the world's resources.  The less politically correct kids are, or the wealthier they are, the sooner they are told they should die.  Accepting the default, average choices in the games tells kids they should die when they are 9 years old.

    Yeah, I know you think I am exaggerating.  Because this is likely to get pulled down soon, I will show you a series of screenshots from it.  Whether it gets pulled down or not, a major media company (with all of its famed multiple levels of editorial control) thought this was a good game for kids.  I actually delayed publishing this, because I wanted to make sure this was not some kind of hack or joke site.  But you can get there right from the by clicking "science" in the top menu and clicking on the planet slayer game icon at the bottom of the science page.  I still wonder whether it's a put on - it's that bad.

    Here is the landing page (click on any page to increase the size):

    k彩平台登陆One

    Yep, that little sign does indeed say "find out when you should die."  Here the game is explained:

    k彩平台登陆Two

    Here is the first question:

    k彩平台登陆Three

    With each question, if you choose any answer that might not indicate that you are a subsistence farmer in Africa living on a $1 a day, your pig gets fatter.  I really encourage you to check out the whole thing.  It is one politically correct litmus test after another.  My pig got slightly fatter, until I got to this one:

    k彩平台登陆Four

    Answering that you spend any more than $10,000 AUS (about a 1:1 conversion with US dollars), your pig will get really fat.  The wealthier you are, the more evil you are in a direct relationship.  It is a point I have made for a while:  global warming alarmists consider their preferred solution to environmental issues to be universal poverty. 

    k彩平台登陆Five

    There is me, really evil, because I earn a good living.  And, as we can see with this question, since I spend my money on ordinary stuff that I actually want, rather than where the authors would like me to spend it, I really suck.  When you hit the final button, you pig is actually exploded in a bloody mess  (yes, the red is blood).  As it turns out, I should have been strangled at birth:

    k彩平台登陆Six

    Hat tip to .  Really, in some ways this is an awesome game.   Never have I seen such a pure combination of Marxist-style zero-sum economics with science-challenged warming alarmism.

    I don't think I need to bother refuting any of this.  If you are new to the site, you can find a .

    Because, You Know, People Are All Exactly the Same and Need the Exact Same Things

    the other day had this headline which certainly caught me attention:

    Report: 35% of Arizona jobs  'bad'

    I can sympathize.  I have had jobs that were boring and unrewarding.  My last couple of Fortune 50 corporate jobs, while nominally cool on paper, were hugely frustrating.  But it seems this particular "report" had different criteria for "bad" jobs:

    The new report calls 35 percent of jobs "bad" because they pay less
    than $17 an hour, or $34,000 a year, and offer no insurance or
    retirement plans. In a typical state, only 30 percent of the jobs are
    considered "bad."

    Here is the heart of these studies:  A bunch of middle class people sit around and try to decide what jobs they would be willing to accept and which ones they would not.  Any job that they would not accept is a "bad" job, despite the fact that $12 or $14 an hour might be very good pay for someone with no skills, despite the fact that it makes no consideration of a person's circumstances (e.g. single, married, 2nd job, teenager, etc), and despite the fact that $34,000 would probably put a person in the top 20th  percentile of global wages.  I made a similar point vis a vis jobs in the third world.

    Just so I can't be accused of cherry-picking, I will use my own company as an example.  We have a about 80 employees in Arizona, about 70 of which are paid less than $10 an hour and none of whom have a retirement plan or insurance.  All of my jobs in Arizona are included in their count of "bad jobs."  And you know what?  We have a waiting list of over 200 names of people who would take another of these jobs tomorrow if I had one to offer.  That's because my employees are not middle-class academics.   Most are older people who already have a health plan, who don't need a retirement plan (because they have already retired) and who just want a fun job in a nice location where they can live in their RV. 

    This has to be one of the most utterly pointless studies of all time.  Sure, $14 an hour would probably suck as a 45-year-old college grad with 2 kids.  But it would be a windfall to a 16-year-old new immigrant with few skills and no English.  The only thing that would be more pointless would be to try to compare states - which they also do:

    About 22 percent of Arizona jobs are considered "good" because they pay
    at least $17 and offer benefits. That is less than the typical state,
    which has 25 percent "good" jobs. The rest of the jobs are in between
    because they offer some benefits.

    Since cost of living is totally comparable between Phoenix and Manhattan, then using a fixed wage rate to compare states makes complete sense.  By the way, by the study's definition, my job, which is usually awesome, is not "good" because I have no health plan.  In fact, in this study, a $40,000 job with a health plan is ranked as good while a $400,000 job with no health plan is not good.  Yeah, that makes sense.

    Two Old Favorites Re-Discovered in the Same Day

    The other day, I was sorting through my bookshelves trying to find something for my son to read.  He just blew through the four books of the Hyperion series and was looking for fresh meat.  As I was browsing, I picked up Neil Stephenson's Snow Crash, which I have not read in several years.  Despite reading the book twice before, I was immediately engulfed by the first chapter.  I know I am a geek, but I honestly think that the first chapter of Snow Crash may be the best opening of any book I have ever read.

    I seldom watch TV, but later that day I had just finished watching the A&E remake of Andromeda Strain, which was a favorite of mine when I was a boy.  I happened across the Redford-Dunaway movie "Three Days of the Condor."  This is one of my favorite spy movies, and not just because I am a sucker for Faye Dunaway (I always thought the young Faye Dunaway would have been a great Dagny Taggert in Atlas Shrugged.)  One of the reasons I like the movie is its pacing.  I enjoy a full-speed ahead never-take-a-breath action movie as much as the next person, but do they all have to be that way.  This was a thriller with an almost languid pace. 

    Boy Is This Election Is Going to Suck

    It is nothing new for politicians and the powerful to despise commerce and "traders."  In Medieval society, and continuing in Europe right up into the 19th century, the ruling elite scorned careers that involved actual productive effort.  If you were actually producing something, rather than indolently feeding yourself off the work of the masses, you were not a "gentleman."

    It appears that this attitude is coming back in vogue, most notably from the presidential candidates of both parties.  :

    Sen. Obama told the students that "our individual
    salvation depends on collective salvation." He disparaged students who
    want to "take your diploma, walk off this stage, and chase only after
    the big house and the nice suits and all the other things that our
    money culture says you should buy."

    The people Mr. Obama is sneering at are the ones who
    built America "“ the traders and entrepreneurs and manufacturers who
    gave us railroads and airplanes, housing and appliances, steam engines,
    electricity, telephones, computers and Starbucks. Ignored here is the
    work most Americans do, the work that gives us food, clothing, shelter
    and increasing comfort. It's an attitude you would expect from a
    Democrat.

    Or this year's Republican nominee. John McCain also
    denounces "self-indulgence" and insists that Americans serve "a
    national purpose that is greater than our individual interests." During
    a Republican debate at the Reagan Library on May 3, 2007, Sen. McCain
    derided Mitt Romney's leadership ability, saying, "I led . . . out of
    patriotism, not for profit." Challenged on his statement, Mr. McCain
    elaborated that Mr. Romney "managed companies, and he bought, and he
    sold, and sometimes people lost their jobs. That's the nature of that
    business." He could have been channeling Barack Obama.

    Mr. Boaz mentions the hypocrisy of Obama having a million dollar house and being famous for his beautiful suits, and then telling graduates not to aspire for the same things.  But a bigger hypocrisy, or perhaps contradiction, is the fact that the candidates must know that the world won't function if everyone were to take their advice.  While bashing the productive, each relies on the productive to fund his plans.  While urging everyone to be parasites, they must know that some must ignore their advice to become the productive hosts on which the parasites feed.

    But hypocrisy is not the biggest issue. The real issue
    is that Messrs. Obama and McCain are telling us Americans that our
    normal lives are not good enough, that pursuing our own happiness is
    "self-indulgence," that building a business is "chasing after our money
    culture," that working to provide a better life for our families is a
    "narrow concern."

    They're wrong. Every human life counts. Your life
    counts. You have a right to live it as you choose, to follow your
    bliss. You have a right to seek satisfaction in accomplishment. And if
    you chase after the almighty dollar, you just might find that you are
    led, as if by an invisible hand, to do things that improve the lives of
    others.

    Encore!

    It is an indicator of the power of the state that most CEO's of public companies feel the need to pay lip service to every politically correct trend that comes along and to engage in outright sycophancy every time they meet with politicians.  The reason, unfortunately, is that morons like Maxine Waters have been granted nearly unlimited powers over commerce.  Some CEOs unfortunately go even further, going beyond just humoring politicians to play the game themselves, engaging in outright rent-seeking for themselves and their shareholders.

    So it is in this context that it is nice to see the CEO of Exxon-Mobil continuing in that company's traditions of :

    Rex Tillerson, chairman and chief executive of Exxon Mobil Corp.,
    the world's largest oil-and-gas company, came out swinging Wednesday
    against the environmental movement, arguing the science of climate
    change is far from settled and that his company views it as its
    "corporate social responsibility" to continue to supply the world with
    fossil fuels....

    Avoiding the political correctness that many oil executives are now
    showing on global warming, Mr. Tillerson called for a continuation of
    the debate, rather than acceptance that it is occurring, with the
    potential consequence that governments will implement policies that put
    world economies at risk.

    "My view is that this is so extraordinarily important to people the
    world over, that to not have a debate on it is irresponsible," he said.
    "To suggest that we know everything we need to know about these issues
    is irresponsible.

    "And I will take all the criticism that comes with it. Anybody that
    tells you that they got this figured out is not being truthful. There
    are too many complexities around climate science for anybody to fully
    understand all of the causes and effects and consequences of what you
    may chose to do to attempt to affect that. We have to let scientists to
    continue their investigative work, unencumbered by political
    influences. This is too important to be cute with it."

    Mr. Tillerson said Exxon Mobil, despite its reputation as a staunch
    climate change denier, is in fact close to the issue as the only oil
    company that is a member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel
    on Climate Change.

    Exxon Mobil came under repeated attack during the rowdy meeting for
    not showing leadership to combat global warming, with some arguing it
    is putting shareholders' capital at risk by not moving into greener
    energy.

    Among the many critics who stood up in the city's Morton H. Meyerson
    Symphony Centre, where the meeting was held, was Neva Rockefeller
    Goodwin, the great-granddaughtger of John D. Rockefeller, who founded
    Exxon's predecessor 125 years ago.

    But her proposal to have Exxon Mobil prepare a report on the impact
    of climate change on emerging countries and to embrace greener energy
    was backed by only 10.4% of shareholders.

    The Exxon shareholder meeting is a zoo.  LIttle serious work gets done.  There are about a zillion people who buy one share of stock so they can show up and flog whatever political hobby horse they have.  I do wish I had been there, though, so that in response to Ms. Goodwin's proposal I could have in turn asked for a report on how alarmist-proposed 80% reductions in fossil fuel consumption would have impacted poverty and progress in developing countries. 

    A while back I had observed that Wal-Mart had passed Exxon as the left's #1 Satan.  It is good to see Exxon back on top. 

    Myth Of The Anything But Freaking Stupid Voter

    :

    Ben Smith the fact that 10% of Americans believe that Obama is a Muslim in context:

    "Large minorities of Americans consistently say they
    hold wildly out-of-the-mainstream views, often specifically discredited
    beliefs. In some cases, those views should make them pretty profoundly
    alienated from one party or the other.

    For instance:

    President Bush knew about the 9/11 attacks in advance.

    Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.

    they've been in the presence of a ghost.

    the sun revolves around the Earth."

    I Think You Have Me Confused With Eliot Spitzer

    An email inquiry I received today:

    I am a reporter for the Orlando Sentinel in Florida. I need a comment for a story on prostitution.

    I actually think there is an organization with 'coyote' in the name that is more active on this topic, so I presume that was the source of confusion.  Not really sure how my wife would react to this inquiry.  However, since we are on the topic, I have written a couple of rants supporting the legalization of prostitution.  In short, I think there is a good case to be made that most of the abuses of prostitution result from its illegality (and therefore lack of ability of its participants to call on the legal system for help).  While one may find prostitution distasteful, the government should protect our bodies and our wallets from assault rather than worrying whether we are tarnishing our souls. 

    This "Price" Thingie

    :

    The FHWA's "Traffic Volume Trends" report, produced monthly since 1942, shows
    that estimated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on all U.S. public roads for March
    2008 fell 4.3 percent as compared with March 2007 travel. This is the first time
    estimated March travel on public roads fell since 1979. At 11 billion miles less
    in March 2008 than in the previous March, this is the sharpest yearly drop for
    any month in FHWA history.

    Someone really should research this phenomenon.  It is almost if gasoline prices, which we all know exist solely for the benefit of oil company profits and to support oil company CEO pay, have this heretofore unsuspected utility to modify demand for scarce resources. 

    Not to be deterred by this spurious data point, the :

    The current high price of gas has led to a lot of crazy proposals from
    gas tax holidays to creating a tax deduction based upon energy
    consumption. But Rep. Paul Kanjorski's (D-PA) may top them all in terms
    of its stupidity. From the Times Leader, Kanjorski's plan would do the
    following:

        "¢ H.R. 5800 would tax industries' windfall profits.

    "¢ The bill would set up a Reasonable Profits Board to determine when
    these companies' profits are in excess, and then tax them on those
    windfall profits.

        "¢ As oil and gas companies' windfall profits increase, so would the tax rate for those companies.

    "¢ Kanjorski said his legislation will encourage oil companies to lower
    prices to prevent them from receiving higher tax rates.

    Congressmen Make Themselves Outlaws

    :

    "It shall be illegal and a violation of this Act," declared the House
    of Representatives, "to limit the production or distribution of oil,
    natural gas, or any other petroleum product"¦ or to otherwise take any
    action in restraint of trade for oil, natural gas, or any petroleum
    product when such action, combination, or collective action has a
    direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect on the market,
    supply, price, or distribution of oil, natural gas, or other petroleum
    product in the United States."

    Well, OPEC nations may or may not be in violation of this law.  My guess is that if incompetence and general third-world type fraud is actionable, then they are guilty.  It may be tougher to prove outright conspiracy.

    BUT, there is one nation that has, right there on the public record, clear government legislation that substantially limits development of some of the largest potential new oil reserves in the US.  That country is the United States, and by passage of this law, the entire Congress has made itself outlaws.

    Not Surprised

    I thought it was kind of funny, as I was paging through my referrer logs, to see this search find me:

    +"calling in sick" +blog

    The search game from Google.fr

    Prediction Market at Work?

    Today, , Indy car driver most famous for, uh, having ovaries.  The article says that this new deal was signed well ahead of the expiration of the old deal later this year.

    I am struck by the fact that this deal was inked just days before the Indy 500, the winning of which would greatly increase Patrick's value.  I wonder if this is based on some kind of insider knowledge by GoDaddy of Patrick's chances of winning this weekend.

    The Oil Reality

    Yesterday we saw the people who have done the most to keep oil prices high (e.g. Congress) trying to blame shift their policy failures onto oil company executives.  Hilariously, Maxine Waters thinks she would do a better job for consumers if she were in charge of the US oil companies. 

    Beyond the realities of supply and demand, which I guess we all despair of teaching Congress, there were these remarks by Shell's John Hofmeister (via ):

    While all oil-importing nations buy oil at global prices, some, notably
    India and Chinak彩平台登陆, subsidize the cost of oil products to their nation's
    consumers, feeding the demand for more oil despite record prices. They
    do this to speed economic growth and to ensure a competitive advantage
    relative to other nations.

    Meanwhile, in the United States, access to our own oil and gas
    resources has been limited for the last 30 years, prohibiting companies
    such as Shell from exploring and developing resources for the benefit
    of the American people.

    Senator Sessions, I agree, it is not a free market.

    According to the Department of the Interior, 62 percent of all
    on-shore federal lands are off limits to oil and gas developments, with
    restrictions applying to 92 percent of all federal lands. We have an
    outer continental shelf moratorium on the Atlantic Ocean, an outer
    continental shelf moratorium on the Pacific Ocean, an outer continental
    shelf moratorium on the eastern Gulf of Mexico, congressional bans on
    on-shore oil and gas activities in specific areas of the Rockies and
    Alaska, and even a congressional ban on doing an analysis of the
    resource potential for oil and gas in the Atlantic, Pacific and eastern
    Gulf of Mexico.

    The Argonne National Laboratory did a report in 2004 that identified
    40 specific federal policy areas that halt, limit, delay or restrict
    natural gas projects. I urge you to review it. It is a long list. If I
    may, I offer it today if you would like to include it in the record.

    When many of these policies were implemented, oil was selling in the
    single digits, not the triple digits we see now. The cumulative effect
    of these policies has been to discourage U.S. investment and send U.S.
    companies outside the United States to produce new supplies.

    As a result, U.S. production has declined so much that nearly 60 percent of daily consumption comes from foreign sources.

    The problem of access can be solved in this country by the same
    government that has prohibited it. Congress could have chosen to lift
    some or all of the current restrictions on exportation and production
    of oil and gas. Congress could provide national policy to reverse the
    persistent decline of domestically secure natural resource development.

    This is a point I have made for a while:

    Exxon Mobil is the largest U.S. oil and gas company, but we account for
    only 2 percent of global energy production, only 3 percent of global
    oil production, only 6 percent of global refining capacity, and only 1
    percent of global petroleum reserves. With respect to petroleum
    reserves, we rank 14th.
    Government-owned national oil companies dominate the top spots. For an
    American company to succeed in this competitive landscape and go head
    to head with huge government-backed national oil companies, it needs
    financial strength and scale to execute massive complex energy projects
    requiring enormous long-term investments.

    Lots more good stuff, check it out.

    Plasma Rain

    A little astronomy pr0n for you today,

    1970s, Here We Come

    The economy, the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party are all acting more and more like they did in the 1970s.  Keep your head down, and expect .

    Giving Nothing Back

    A few minutes ago, on some cable show, I saw a viewer comment that said something like "I am tired of big oil taking in billions and billions of dollars and giving nothing back.  It is time for the era of big oil to end."

    Wow -- I would sure suggest he trying going to a different gas station.  Every time I give the oil companies some money, they give me back a tank of gasoline.  This gasoline has great value to me, and is something I could never produce for myself (OK, actually, I bet I could, but you know what I mean).  In fact, the only organization that takes my money and gives me nothing back in return in the government.

    New Indiana Jones Movie Just OK

    I saw the new Indiana Jones movie with my kids this morning.  It was OK.  The chase / fight scenes were great, and the effects were terrific.  But the plot was so-so  (George Lucas has a writing credit, so I could just refer you back to the Padme** dialog in the last 2 Star Wars movie).  There is sometimes a fine line between good fantasy and silliness, and the movie crosses back and forth several times.  Also, you just can't beat Nazis for over-the-top bad guys.  The Boris-and-Natasha style Soviets just don't serve as well.  Overall, worth seeing if you liked the others, and certainly better than Temple of Doom.  But I wouldn't stand in line to see it.

    ** Interesting fact that maybe I am the last person in the world to know:  Do you know who the actress was that played the fake Queen / Padme double in Star Wars Episode 1?  I always thought it was Natalie Portman, but that is actually not correct.  It was an uncredited role, and the actress was always in elaborate makeup.  Who was it?  It was Keira Knightly, of Pirates and Beckham fame.

    Not Sure this Is A Point of Pride...

    :

    Mom-and-pop service stations are running into a problem as
    gasoline marches toward $4 a gallon: Thousands of old-fashioned pumps
    can't register more than $3.99 on their spinning mechanical dials.

    We operate a marina in the back-end of nowhere in Colorado where, since we can only accept less-than-full-truckload gas shipments, we were paying wholesale prices over $3.50 last summer.  We attempted to go to $4.09 on the retail pump, and wham, we ran up against this retail equivalent of the Y2k bug.

    Zoning and the Housing Bubble

    The Anti-Planner links an article by a Federal Reserve Bank economist on the housing market in Houston and :

    "Given that Houstonians had access to the same new types of
    mortgages as the rest of the country and that Houston has had greater
    population growth than other large metros, we might expect price
    appreciation to be stronger in Houston than elsewhere," says the
    article. "However, the opposite has been true."

    The reason? Houston's lack of zoning and its large supply of land
    available for development allowed builders to respond to easy credit by
    increasing the pace of construction. Slow and unpredictable permitting
    processes prevented builders in many other regions, including Florida
    and the Pacific Coast states, from similarly stepping up production.

    While some cities and regions have further delayed construction by imposing adequate public facilities or concurrency ordinances, Houston allows developers to create their own municipal utility districts.
    Through these districts, the developers install the sewer, water, and
    other facilities needed by their developments and charge the property
    owners over time.

    The result is that housing prices did not bubble, and they are not
    significantly declining today. As of the fourth quarter of 2007, in
    fact, they were still increasing. Anecdotal evidence from local
    realtors and developers indicates that the tightening credit market has
    soften the demand for k彩平台登陆s under $200,000, but k彩平台登陆s above that price
    are still selling well.

    Whatever correction Houston faces, says the article, "takes place in
    the context of prices that are squarely in line with local construction
    costs and without the painful supply-induced downturn under way in many
    other markets." This leaves Houston relatively immune to the ups and
    downs of housing prices experienced in regions with planning-induced
    housing shortages.

    I need to think a bit about how that relates to this.

    The Carbon Offset Sausage Factory

    For quite a while, I have been arguing that cap-and-trade schemes are inferior to straight carbon taxes because of their susceptibility to rent-seeking and manipulation.  At the top of the list of problems is the carbon offset issue, the notion that someone can create and sell an offset to cap limits by reducing CO2 emissions in some novel way.  The offset products that exist to day are tremendously suspicious, as I wrote here and here.  In particular, the ability to resell the same emission reduction multiple times is a real danger.

    The Guardian has an interesting look at the offsets being created by that bastion of good governance and management science, the United Nations.

    The world's biggest carbon offset market, the Kyoto Protocol's clean
    development mechanism (CDM), is run by the UN, administered by the
    World Bank, and is intended to reduce emissions by rewarding developing
    countries that invest in clean technologies. In fact, evidence is
    accumulating that it is increasing greenhouse gas emissions behind the
    guise of promoting sustainable development. The misguided mechanism is
    handing out billions of dollars to chemical, coal and oil corporations
    and the developers of destructive dams - in many cases for projects
    they would have built anyway.

    According to David Victor, a
    leading carbon trading analyst at Stanford University in the US, as
    many as two-thirds of the supposed "emission reduction" credits being
    produced by the CDM from projects in developing countries are not
    backed by real reductions in pollution. Those pollution cuts that have
    been generated by the CDM, he argues, have often been achieved at a
    stunningly high cost: billions of pounds could have been saved by
    cutting the emissions through international funds, rather than through
    the CDM's supposedly efficient market mechanism.

    The key problem, as I have pointed out before, is how do you know the reduction is truly incremental?  How do you know that it would not have occured anyway:

    The world's biggest carbon offset market, the Kyoto Protocol's clean
    development mechanism (CDM), is run by the UN, administered by the
    World Bank, and is intended to reduce emissions by rewarding developing
    countries that invest in clean technologies. In fact, evidence is
    accumulating that it is increasing greenhouse gas emissions behind the
    guise of promoting sustainable development. The misguided mechanism is
    handing out billions of dollars to chemical, coal and oil corporations
    and the developers of destructive dams - in many cases for projects
    they would have built anyway.

    According to David Victor, a
    leading carbon trading analyst at Stanford University in the US, as
    many as two-thirds of the supposed "emission reduction" credits being
    produced by the CDM from projects in developing countries are not
    backed by real reductions in pollution. Those pollution cuts that have
    been generated by the CDM, he argues, have often been achieved at a
    stunningly high cost: billions of pounds could have been saved by
    cutting the emissions through international funds, rather than through
    the CDM's supposedly efficient market mechanism....

    One glaring signal that many of the projects being approved by the
    CDM's executive board are non-additional is that almost three-quarters
    of projects were already complete at the time of approval. It would
    seem clear that a project that is already built cannot need extra
    income in order to be built.

    LOL, yes that might be a good indicator something is amiss.  The other problem, beyond the staggering amount of outright corruption one would expect from any UN-operated enterprise, is this oddity:

    Any type of technology other than nuclear power can apply for credits.
    Even new coal plants, if these can be shown to be even a marginal
    improvement upon existing plants, can receive offset income. A massive
    4,000MW coal plant on the coast of Gujarat, India, is expected soon to
    apply for CERs. The plant will spew into the atmosphere 26m tonnes of
    CO2 per year for at least 25 years. It will be India's third - and the
    world's 16th - largest source of CO2 emissions.

    So nuclear plants, the one proven economic and scalable power technology that is free of CO2 emissions is the one technology that is excluded from the program?  But 4,000MW coal plants that can proves they are marginally more efficient than they might have been are A-OK?

    Congress, Sue Thyself

    :

    The House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved legislation on
    Tuesday allowing the Justice Department to sue OPEC members for
    limiting oil supplies and working together to set crude prices, but the
    White House threatened to veto the measure.

    The bill would
    subject OPEC oil producers, including Saudi Arabia, Iran and Venezuela,
    to the same antitrust laws that U.S. companies must follow.

    The measure passed in a 324-84 vote, a big enough margin to override a presidential veto.

    The
    legislation also creates a Justice Department task force to
    aggressively investigate gasoline price gouging and energy market
    manipulation.

    "This bill guarantees that oil prices will reflect
    supply and demand economic rules, instead of wildly speculative and
    perhaps illegal activities," said Democratic Rep. Steve Kagen of
    Wisconsin, who sponsored the legislation.

    I am sure, either through scheming or more likely incompetance, that OPEC countries are under-supplying their potential capacity for oil production.  But if we want to deem this a crime, who is the biggest criminal?   The US is the only country I know of that has, by statute, made illegal the development of enormous domestic reserves.  Just last week, Democracts in Congress, in fact the exact same folks sponsoring this bill, voted to continue an effective moratorium on US oil shale development.  No country in the world is doing less to develop the most promising oil reserves than is the US.  Congress, sue thyself.  I mocked this idea weeks ago when Hillary first suggested it.  If this passes, I would love to see the US counter-sued for not developing ANWR.  Or large areas of the Gulf.  Or most of the Pacific coast.  Or all of the Atlantic coast.  Or our largest-in-the-world oil shale deposits. 

    Arrested for Being Creepy

    :

    More and more, it looks like the real crime of the Fundamentalist
    Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is being different and ...
    well ... creepy. The FLDS has apparently been because its tenets and practices rub America's increasingly intolerant soccer moms and suburban dads the wrong way.

    We just can't let people live that way!

    I'm as weirded out by the Persian-harem-via-How The West Was Won
    ambience that clings to the FLDS as the next guy, but I want
    allegations of abuse against the group to be (fancy this) based on
    actual evidence, and addressed on an individual basis, rather than as
    an excuse for a pogrom. That is, as weirded out as we all may be, you
    prosecute the actual abusers among the oddball minorities (as well as
    the bland majorities) and leave everybody else the hell alone.

    Next thing you now, we'll be locking up college lacrosse players just because they are rich white guys.

    Business Biorythms Just Hit A Triple Low

    People who say that bad things come in threes never ran a small business.  Bad things can come in much larger, Costco-sized lots.  Such is the case today in my own little corner of the American economy.  Expect blogging to be light for a few days.  Also, I may be slow to fix the RSS problem that has been reported.  Sorry.

    PS-  The big lots of bad stuff seem to come just after one was thinking "gee, its kind of quiet around here, maybe I will take a day off this week..."

    More Reasons to Fear Public Employee Unions

    Most all local governments have extensive programs in place for government inspection of elevators because, you know, private businesses can't be trusted to operate safe equipment.  :


    has spent close to $1 billion to install more than 200 new elevators
    and escalators in the subway system since the early 1990s, and it plans
    to spend almost that much again for dozens more machines through the
    end of the next decade. It is an investment of historic dimensions,
    aimed at better serving millions of riders and opening more of the
    subway to the disabled.

    These are the results:

    ¶One of every six elevators and
    escalators in the subway system was out of service for more than a
    month last year, according to the transit agency's data.

    ¶The
    169 escalators in the subway averaged 68 breakdowns or repair calls
    each last year, with the worst machines logging more than double that
    number. And some of the least reliable escalators in the system are
    also some of the newest, accumulating thousands of hours out of service
    for what officials described as a litany of mechanical flaws.

    ¶Two-thirds of the subway elevators "” many of which travel all of 15
    feet "” had at least one breakdown last year in which passengers were
    trapped inside.

    The whole thing is pretty depressing.  But perhaps just as depressing is the fact that the NY Times, in a quite lengthy article, never once questions why the government is in the elevator maintenance business at all.  You see, the New York City Transit system hires all of its own maintenance people, presumably because, though the article never mentions it, the public employees union insists that these functions remain in house.  OK, here is a quiz:  How many private elevator owners in New York City have their own staff repair elevators?  My guess is the answer is close to zero.  Everyone uses or operate under long-term service contracts with the manufacturer.  Why?  Well, lets see what problems NY Transit faces:

    "They don't have enough competent people with the proper training,"
    said Michele O'Toole, the president of J. Martin Associates, which the
    transit agency hired in 2006 to evaluate its elevator operations. "It
    all reflects back to qualifications, training, capabilities."...

    Elevators and escalators are spread out over a far-flung system,
    requiring more mechanics and slowing responses to breakdowns. There has
    been little standardization of parts, so mechanics must cope with a
    bewildering hodgepodge of machinery. And the machines, which operate 24
    hours a day, are subject to all sorts of abuse: Elevators become
    makeshift bathrooms, and escalator steps are pounded by heavily loaded
    hand trucks.

    Guess what?  These are all classic reasons for outsourcing.  Manhattan elevator maintenance companies are set up to handle a far-flung elevator inventory, and can more efficiently stock parts, buy special equipment, and provide specialized training than can any individual operator.   Shared external capacity can also be sized and used much more efficiently to deal with random failures -- the more elevators in a region one maintains, the better staff can be utilized across a stochastic system.

    But of course, the NY Times is never going to go against any public employee union, so it takes the line that this is a good governance issue, rather than a structural issue where an individual elevator owner is always going to be less efficient than outsourcing to a large regional third party company.  It compares NY Transit to other public transit agencies, but not to other private owners of elevators.  My guess is Donald Trump owns more elevators than NY Transit - how does he handle elevator maintenance?

    By the way, the article says that there are 167 elevators and 169 escalators in the system.  They also say there are 200 full-time maintenance people.  So, on average, one person spends 60% of their year on a single elevator or escalator.  Think about the elevators and escalators you ride every day.  Can you imagine someone working on it for 1200 hours a year?

    And what is this in the quotes above about slow responses to breakdowns in the far-flung empire?  With 200 people for 336 devices, they could practically assign an individual repair person to each one.   I can see him now, with his toolbox, sitting on a folding chair in the back of the elevator with a box of Krispy Kremes, waiting to spring into action at the moment of failure.

    Leaving the Scence of an Accident

    I include this mainly because I have a funny mental image of a couple of guys crashing the plane and then :

    A single-engine plane has crashed near the airport in Bagdad, a
    remote community northwest of Wickenburg, but the pilot apparently
    walked away and has not been found, authorities said Monday.

    The wreckage of the downed plane, a Beech Model B23, was discovered
    early Sunday about 100 yards south of the Bagdad Airport runway, said
    Dwight D'Evelyn, a spokesman for the Yavapai County Sheriff's Office.

    k彩平台登陆Php4831e9b5885fd

    Comparing Phoenix to Seattle and Austin

    writes an article this week that begins with this headline:

    Phoenix can learn economically from robust Seattle and Austin

    Already, my BS antenna are deployed.  Why?  I don't know anything about Mr. Graham, but nearly every 20- or 30-something journalist would like all the world to be hip and freaky and trendy and cool like Seattle or Austin (or Boulder or San Francisco).  So they have a natural predisposition to writing a story and interpreting facts to say that Phoenix (or whatever uncool city they hail from) should do everything it can to emulate Seattle or Portland or whatever is the hip city of the moment. 

    I have lived in Phoenix and Seattle and Boulder, and have done business in Portland and Austin.  And if you want to find a really great music club, Austin would be your place.  And if you are a really rich guy who wants a unique lake front k彩平台登陆 and a dock for his floatplane, Seattle would be the pick.  But if you were a middle class family trying to get the most k彩平台登陆 for your money, you would take Phoenix all the way.  And if you wanted to start a real business that makes stuff, you would be insane to do it in any of these cities except Phoenix (and perhaps Austin).  Portland and Seattle and Boulder and (more recently) Austin are what one might call rich snob - poor snob towns.  They appeal to the millionaire with the fractional ownership jet and the pierced and tattooed slacker club goer.  Which is fine, but does every city really need to be like them?

    Unlike the Valley, some parts of the U.S. such as Seattle and Austin
    have been only slightly affected by the national economic slowdown.

    Neither area has experienced the Valley's level of falling k彩平台登陆 prices, increased foreclosure rates nor its slowed job growth.

    Those regions are places that Phoenix could learn from as it charts
    a future based less on housing and growth and more on competing in the
    global economy.

    OK, lets start with the k彩平台登陆 thing, since the article focuses A LOT on housing.  I am willing to concede that in some recent period Austin and Seattle had less of a k彩平台登陆 price drop than Phoenix.  Ignoring for a moment the absurdity of extrapolating 30 year trends from 6-12 months of data, we should look structurally at these housing markets.  It turns out that Seattle, for example, has MUCH higher median k彩平台登陆 prices than Phoenix, in large part due to structural regulatory factors that I would presume the author would like Phoenix to emulate. 

    As a result, the median k彩平台登陆 price in Seattle is about while the median in Phoenix is closer to .  In fact, the Seattle median is very close to the Phoenix 75th percentile.  [note figures do not match those in article - I could not find any two median k彩平台登陆 price numbers that were the same for a market] One comment on Seattle housing was :

    The pattern is very strong: In Seattle you have affluent, largely
    single people chasing a small supply of urban housing. The result is
    small household size, an exodus of families to the suburbs, and very
    high housing prices in the city.

    Is this really what Phoenix should emulate, just because our k彩平台登陆 prices dropped more over a 6 month period?

    One year ago, the Valley's job growth ranked No. 7 among
    metropolitan markets with more than 1 million workers, according to the
    latest Blue Chip Job Growth Update released by the W.P. Carey School of
    Business at Arizona State University.

    It now ranks No. 20, while Seattle is  No. 2.

    In job markets with less than 1 million workers, Austin ranks  No. 14.

    So, until recently, Phoenix led both cities in job growth.  In the last year, we have fallen behind.  Can anyone on the planet tell me why the last year of data is more relevant than the previous five, or ten, when Phoenix dusted these markets?  One year of downturn and suddenly Phoenix's economy needs to be restructured by some massive government 5-year plan?

    But here is the really funny part.  Let's take Seattle, the economic juggernaut with which the author is so enamored.  In 1960, Seattle had a population of about 550,000 people.  In 2000, Seattle had a population of about.... 550,000.  In the same time period Phoenix grew from 726,000 to 3.2 million.  Wow, that Seattle is a growth juggernaut.  But it is hard to get apples and oranges on MSA's and such, so here is data from a :  From 1990-2000, the Austin MSA added 400,000 people, Seattle MSA added 382,000 people and Phoenix added 1.01 million, more than the other two combined.  Presumably, most of these folks found work, so where are all the jobs being added?

    In Phoenix, "housing-related employment is falling fast, and the
    impact on the economy is extreme since the industry comprises over 15
    percent of total employment . . . compared to 10 percent nationwide,"
    an April Moody's Economy.com report said.

    This is hilarious.  We happen to be in a housing market downturn, so Phoenix is doomed because it is overweighted towards k彩平台登陆 construction.  But did anyone visit Seattle or Austin in 2001/2002 after the tech bubble crash?  It was a bloodbath, far worse than what Phoenix is experiencing today.  This kind of analysis is so short-sighted as to be absurd. 

    Maricopa County's average weekly wages increased 3.8 percent to $822
    in the third quarter of 2007, according to the latest numbers available
    from the U.S. Department of Labor.

    Weekly wages in King County, k彩平台登陆 to Seattle, rose 8 percent to
    $1,129. Wages in Travis County, k彩平台登陆 to Austin, rose to $911, a 2.7
    percent jump.

    Meanwhile, Arizona's average per person income ($33,029) grew by the
    smallest percentage among states in 2007, according to the U.S. Bureau
    of Economic Analysis.

    One word for you:  immigration.  Arizona has gotten hundreds of thousands of new immigrants with relatively low skills, so they come in at the bottom of the income scale and drive median wages down.  Seattle and Austin immigration, to the extent they have it, are high-skilled and highly paid.  Does every city have to be a high-income yuppie white-Asian enclave like Seattle?  I like Arizona and its Hispanic influences, even if this immigration means the governor can't puff her chest out at the governors' conference over average wages.

    The two cities have a greater percentage of employment in tech jobs,
    with 9.2 percent in Austin and 8.8 in Seattle compared with 4.6 percent
    in Phoenix.

    Sorry, but I have never thought it a goal of government to subsidize and maximize "tech jobs."  The other 95.4% of us in Phoenix without a job statistically categorized by the government as a tech job are happy not to be subsidizing the other 4.6%.  This is the kind of effort that does nothing to help the average person, who will never have a tech job, but makes government officials feel really good about themselves.  Another way of putting it:  The author is suggesting the government single-mindedly focus on subsidizing a class of jobs that 90+% of the people in all three cities do not hold.

    Postscript: For those of you who want to laugh yourself silly, you really need to read the "vision" in the sidebar of .  It is the most incredible collection of politically correct notions without any relationship to real value creation that I have ever seen.  I can't really do it justice, but here are some highlights:

    2010

    The latest housing bust finally convinces the Arizona Legislature to
    fund an aggressive international-economic-development program that
    invests in science, engineering, technology and higher education.

    Incentives draw nutraceutical firms, which use food substances to make
    products that provide health benefits, such as lycopene.
    Green-technology firms partner with universities to launch companies
    that turn a profit...

    2035

    High-paying technology jobs are clustered in three major areas from
    Prescott to Phoenix to Tucson. The economy boasts an $800 billion
    nutraceutical industry and the world's largest solar facility with
    10,000 acres of sun power.

    I bet they include no offset in their study for lost growth due to higher taxes to fund this.  And our city of 5-10 million people is going to build its economy on nutraceuticals?  We're going to have a vitamin water business that, at $800 billion, is 6% the current size of the entire US economy?  I sure hope some of the business school students who wrote this either wise up or go into academics, because if they try to walk in to a real corporate board room with this stuff they are going to get skewered.

  • Recent Posts

  • George Floyd, A Memo to Conservatives
  • George Floyd, A Memo to Progressives
  • Another Climate-COVID Computer Modelling Similarity
  • Parallels Between COVID-19 Alarm and Global Warming Alarm
  • For the Left, Excess Hospital Beds Were "Too Many Deoderants" ... Until This Month
  • Archives

  • May k彩平台登陆
  • April k彩平台登陆
  • March k彩平台登陆
  • February k彩平台登陆
  • January k彩平台登陆
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • Categories

  • 2013 Shutdown
  • Accountability
  • ACME and Loony Toons
  • Arizona
  • Art
  • Banking and Finance
  • Blogging, Computers & the Internet
  • Books
  • Camping and Outdoors
  • Capitalism & Libertarian Philospohy
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Coyote's Law
  • Crime
  • Data Analysis
  • Drug war
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Equal Marriage Arizona
  • Financial Markets
  • Gaming
  • Gender
  • Gender & Race
  • General Business
  • Good News
  • Government
  • Health Care
  • History
  • Hobbies
  • k彩平台登陆 Theater
  • Humor
  • Immigration
  • Incentives
  • Individual Rights
  • International Affairs
  • International Trade
  • Investing
  • Labor Law
  • Liability / Lawsuits / Insurance
  • Media and the Press
  • Military and War
  • model railroading
  • Movies & Entertainment
  • Music
  • Numbers and Statistics
  • Organizations and Incentives
  • Other
  • photography
  • Police and Prosecutorial Abuse
  • Politics
  • Privacy
  • Private Recreation Management
  • Property Rights
  • Public v. Private
  • Race
  • Rail and Mass Transit
  • Regulation
  • Scams
  • Science
  • Second Ammendment
  • Small Business
  • Sports
  • Taxes
  • Technology
  • The Corporate State
  • Trade Policy
  • Trans-partisan Plans
  • Travel
  • Trend That Is Not A Trend
  • Trends from Single Data Points
  • Tripartisan Plans
  • Uncategorized
  • War on Drugs
  • Search


    WWW Coyote Blog
  • Statistics

  • Site Admin